sensational phrases Porqueddu Vice President: "We respect the laws, we ..." junta rejects and repudiates the Foundation itself, the Region and the City
right arm Saitta: "Joining the association is to violate the rules on public money." The Wrath of directors, "and then complained Cota Chiamparino." Bewilderment in Sbriglio
BONETTI
TORINO. Perhaps the problem of Saitta and Porqueddu Sirach is. But meanwhile, we begin to talk about Philadelphia.
FACTS
last five years, first with Renato Montabone Department of Sport and almost two years with the lawyer Giuseppe Sbriglio in its place, the City of Turin has been following a long and complex process aimed at creating a Foundation Member of to promote the renaissance of Philadelphia. The workbench, with the imprimatur of Mayor Sergio Chiamparino, was attended by leaders of the town hall, municipal managers and technicians, city attorney, members of the Philadelphia area, seven groups of fans and professionals in the Torino Urbano Cairo. Year after year, meetings and studies have followed up the drafting of a statute: now, finally, the Foundation will officially come to life even before a notary public (by appointment at the end of the month except for surprises). Just as the City, yet the region (by voting on a resolution) has already decided to join as a founding member of the new association (which may include also the foundations Sanpaolo and Unicredit). And now for the money. The City has already committed to spending 3.5 million. The Region 3 million. The two banking foundations have announced the governor Roberto Cota would be willing to pay a total of 3 to 4 million. The Municipality has issued a warning notice to all applicants for charter members, which expires Thursday. And the province? What does the Province of Turin? The case has been raised repeatedly in recent days on Tuttosport. On September 22, 2008 (former junta: always Saitta president, anyway) the provincial council voted almost unanimously (only one dissent) two motions, then unified by the opposition councilors and Ettore Carlo Giacometto Puglisi: they called in the Saitta president and the commissioners the power to "help ensure that the Province has accepted one of the founders of the Foundation" and "to allocate a reasonable contribution" (unofficially it was about 500 000 €). September 2008, but since then, nothing. Nothing concrete has made the province to "take action" to "room." And now that si tratta almeno di sedersi davanti a un notaio come socio fondatore, al fianco del Comune, della Regione e di altri enti e associazioni, la Provincia ha incredibilmente deciso di non rispettare quell’indirizzo votato nel 2008. Il consigliere di maggioranza Nicola Pomponio in queste settimane ha esercitato ripetute pressioni affinché la Provincia confermasse gli impegni, ma il presidente Antonio Saitta ha motivato il suo «no» per «superiori, oggettivi problemi di bilancio» (e dire che bastano “appena” 2.500 euro per aderire: quanto versare per la costruzione del Fila, tanto o poco che sia, si può decidere anche in un secondo tempo). Ma Pomponio non si è arreso: «La rinascita del Filadelfia rappresenta un’opera of great historical, social, sporting, cultural. " And the last conference of the group leaders presented an agenda that was immediately discussed in the provincial council membership to the Foundation. An agenda signed by all the IDV group. But gliel'hanno blocked. He then tried to open a discussion at least once in committee: another "no." Dejected, now spreading her arms does not understand. But him, Pomponio, and how it can be understood. All the more so when you consider that to officially reject the Foundation has just been the Vice-Chairman (and Head of Sport) Gianfranco Porqueddu, expression of the same party Pomponio.
WORDS
But what he said right arm Saitta? "The province has repeatedly expressed interest in and commitment to be among the members of the Foundation." But "to translate the documents for policy and political commitment is necessary administrative measures that the project is outlined in the essentials: the total investment requirements, timing of use of funds, the economic project and organizational management of the reconstructed Philadelphia. So "we are currently unable to accede to the invitation of the promoters of the Foundation, we can not bind the County to support economic burden future uncertain and undefined. To do so would violate the rules on accounting by public sector bodies and we would go against the principle of sound administration of public money. When there will be submitted details of the reconstruction project of Philadelphia will evaluate the financial commitment that the province could reasonably support. " Many members of the center have been nothing short of amazed. In the center-right, yells to a "scandal", as for example the director Giacometto, author of a question of: 'It's a shame. In these years they never bothered to do anything to the Row and now they do not know where to find the money run away from the commitments that were made. Porqueddu afraid to take a step illegal if the province ever endorse it only lip service to the Foundation? It 's absurd, paradoxical, then what must be done, and Cota Chiamparino process, since they have also approved of the ad hoc decisions? '. Imagine then the confusion at City Hall, besides in the region: the shock if only councilor for Sport in Turin, Giuseppe Sbriglio lawyer, a member of that party Porqueddu. We forgot. On the official website of the Province, the page dedicated to Saitta, it says: "In developing its political commitment, the President loves to remember a quote from the book of Sirach," that is from the Bible, "the artist admires the work , the political wisdom of the proposal. But if he talks nonsense is a threat to The city says if things do you hate inconclusive. " Sirach: yes.
0 comments:
Post a Comment